The working hours subject to contributions, not only include the time pertinent to the working activity, but also that necessary to the actual preparation necessary to deliver the service.
With the Decision no 277 dated 15th June, 2017, the Italian Data Protection Authority (IDPA), addressed again the matter of the right to be forgotten, stated that whilst the timeframe is a crucial factor, its relevance can be limited if the information, whose cancellation is required, is related to the particular role carried out by the subject in public life.
The Court of Milan, with the judgment no. 7480 published on 4 July 2017, has ruled on copyright by declaring that the right is infringed if the copying artwork is characterized by the same “representative personality that delineates the copied artist’s repertoire “.
The European Court of Human Rights has reiterated the importance of the information that the employee must provide to the worker regarding the possible controls of the business devices used by the employee.