On May 10 2019, Directive 2019/713 concerning the fight against fraud and counterfeiting of non-cash means of payment was published by the European Union (OJ) Official Journal replacing, thus, the Council Framework Decision 2001/413/JHA
Tonucci & Partners, with partners Pasquale Silvestro and Michele Grisafi, has achieved an important result as advisor of
The Supreme Court, with sentence n. 8571 dated 03.27.2019, stated that the faculty provided by article 1481 of the Italian Civil Code concernig the possibility for the promisee buyer to suspend the payment of the price, requires a concrete and actual danger of claim. It follows that the payment suspension or the refusal of signing the final purchase agreement is not legitimate when there is only a mere subjective fear of being evicted.
Gianluca Cambareri, in his recent contributions for TopLegal, underlines the growing expansion of the e-Sports market in Italy
The Italian Budget Law 2019 laid the ground for a reorganization of the entire discipline of maritime state property concessions, providing – inter alia – a regime of “automatic renewal” of the same. However, according to the EU Court of Justice, the automatic and general extension for the tourist exploitation of maritime state properties set forth by the Italian law “prevents to carry out an impartial and transparent selection of the candidates under the EU competition principles”. According to EU (see EU Directive 2006/123/EC, better known as “Bolkestein Directive”), in fact, the tourist exploitation of maritime state properties consists in “services over public soil” and, as such, it has to be subject to free competition.
The partnership started at the new offices in Foggia, between Tonucci&Partners and the BM Avvocati law firm, specialized for many years in the Maritime State Property practice, allows us to provide our clients with a strategic, innovative and highly specialized advice in a sector characterized by a particularly fragmented and uncertain regulatory framework.
The clause that establishes overdue interests exceeding the limit rate, according to art. 2 L. 108 of 07.03.1996 is invalid. That stated the Supreme Court in its injunction 27442 of 30.10.2018.
The Joined Chambers of the Court of Cassation, as per sentence n. 10378 of 14 April 2019, have
Our Fabrizio D’Onofrio interviewed by ItaliaOggi within the dossier “Digital forensic, legal firms seeking technological proofs” concerning the
Tonucci & Partners, with Carlo Scarpa and Ivan Rigatti of Padua Office, assisted Camerin Holding S.r.l. in the
Partner Alessandro Varrenti and Valentino Vescio di Martirano of Tonucci & Partners win in the court of Rome
By sentence no. C-691/17 dated 11 April 2019 regarding the dispute between a Hungarian company and the related national tax and customs administration, and in compliance with Directive 2006/112 / EC, the European Court of Justice has ruled on a case of incorrect application of the ordinary VAT regime to a transaction subject, instead, to reverse charge regime.
Golfo / Mosca Law which introduced the gender quotas in the Boards of Directors of stock exchange quoted
